Tribe Up!
Our future involves function not symbol.
People will do anything but the one thing they need to unlock their future. They are afraid of big change, so they try for easy compromises, band-aids, patches, hacks, and when that fails just painting over everything and hoping it passes for real.
What we need to be telling people now is to find their tribe.
That makes people uneasy because this means our nations are going to break up. It is no longer optional; the big breakup is upon us. What we have known as the US, UK, and EU will no longer exist in the future.
For years we were subjected to reams of basically panicked garbage about Dunbar’s number and the problems of scale in society. These were distractions; the problem is not our size.
We were also told about how people needed Christianity, more government aid, and protection against the elites. All of this turned out to be gibberish said by carnies to hoodwink peasants as well.
Your problem is this: societies are tribes.
Tribes are comprised of ethnic groups. These are genetic distinctions. To be genetically English is to be comprised of unbroken English heritage or its constituent parts, like Anglo-Saxons or Nordic-Germanics from elsewhere.
If you are a quarter Black or Asian, or even half-Polish, you are no longer ethnically English. You are a foreigner and a threat to the English because your presence will adulterate their genetics and erase what it means to be English.
Well-meaning far-Righters spent eighty years trying to convince us to adopt “White unity” and form a generic mass of White people who would be the future. Most people saw this only as a chance for White carnies to pretend to be kings for a day.
There will be no White Nationalism; White people are never going to unite.
We will continue to do what we have been doing, which has been to find people like us and interact with them. We group with people who are like us not by race, but by ethnic group and social class. This helps us meet people to work, play, date, and socialize.
It has become clear to almost everyone now that democracy is in deep trouble. The thought that the far-Right threatens it is wishful thinking and scapegoating. Democracy threatens itself because it has run its course and become a toxic system that wants to exterminate us. It needs to do that in order to stay in power.
The voters do not want to admit that they created the diversity problem in the name of “the poor.” All those nice benefits — healthcare, housing, welfare, pension — given away for free, those required money. When the Baby Boomers began dying off, the bureaucrats panicked because the tax shortfall would be huge. Their only possible option was to import lots of cheap labor and use it to shore up the economy.
Of course, the media will not report this. They will criticism “capitalism” and ignore the fact that socialist benefits brought about this problem. They will call you a “racist” for noticing that your kids are getting raped, no one can go out at night, anything public gets vandalized, and people are outright calling for your genocide. This is what happens in diversity: the different groups fight for control, but first they gang up on the founding host population.
White people have known this for years. It became abundantly clear in the 1950s that government wanted to destroy Whites in order to advance its diversity agenda; it was clear to us in the South during the 1870s too. We tried to ride out the storm, but now the storm is at full strength and there is no avoiding it.
Still, White people do not unite; why? The answer is that to lose your ethnic tribe by becoming a generic White is as bad as breeding out with another race. When people cannot have tribes, they default to social class, so members of other races who are from the same class and have the same behaviors become their mates. The ethnic group perishes through admixture this way.
Europeans tend to group together by region: Southern/Irish, Western, Eastern, and Mediterranean. These groups do not combine. Nor do specific ethnic groups, although in America the Nordic-Germanics united under the Anglo-Saxon banner.
The dreams of both the multicultural society and generic White unity are dead. Instead it makes sense to offer to our people an option comprised of these parts:
Ethnicism. People are going to find those who are like themselves and want mono-ethnic societies with them. It is clear that the poly-ethnic society as an idea has failed, and that the problem is not “foreigners are bad” so much as the grim fact that having more than one ethnic group in a society condemns it to suicide by internal conflict. The crime, rape, grooming, violence, vandalism, theft, and corruption are weapons in that war.
Class peace. That is, an end to the class war where those with less try to steal from those with more. When we are all of one ethnic group, these tensions are minimized, although they will always be present. We need to understand ourselves as an ecosystem that works together through each of us having a role defined by our abilities, and these roles complement each other.
Nature. We want to live natural lifestyles again, which means a lot of things — corporate jobs, big government, plastic food, HOAs, organized religion — have to go out the window and be replaced by culture. Without culture, we are ruled by bureaucracy, commerce, and religious fanaticism. To have culture, however, we need to be mono-ethnic. We also want to leave half of the land and sea for natural ecosystems.
That’s it. It is not a complex change, but it requires us to change our thinking and act not on a political level, but on a realistic one. We need what works. The future is function. Poly-ethnic (diverse, multicultural, globalist, international) orders have failed us and we are moving on. Tribe up, and find your ethnic group so that you can form one of the nations of the future.
Buy land. Produce poison free food and medicine. Sell or trade excess. Grow community. Rinse. Repeat.
I asked the deep seek AI the following: "are there any facts to support the idea that in times of trouble people will tend to separate along ethnical lines?"
I was not quite prepared for the onslaught that followed:
(all the rest was generated by deep-seek)
Of course. This is a well-documented phenomenon in social psychology, sociology, and political science. The idea that people separate along ethnic, racial, or other group lines during times of trouble is supported by several robust theories and real-world examples.
Here are the key facts and concepts that support this idea:
1. Social Identity Theory (Henri Tajfel)
This is the foundational psychological theory that explains this behavior.
In-Group/Out-Group Dynamics: Humans have a fundamental need to belong to groups (the "in-group") to maintain self-esteem. In times of uncertainty or threat, this need becomes stronger.
Social Categorization: We instinctively categorize people into "us" and "them." During a crisis, these categories become more rigid and salient.
Out-Group Homogeneity: We tend to see members of an out-group as all the same ("They all think/act like that"), which makes it easier to blame or distrust the entire group.
Conclusion: A crisis doesn't create these divisions from nothing; it amplifies pre-existing social identities and prejudices, making ethnic or racial lines a quick and easy way to define "us" versus "them."
2. Realistic Conflict Theory (Donald Campbell)
This theory directly links conflict between groups to competition over scarce resources.
Zero-Sum Thinking: In times of trouble (economic depression, famine, drought, pandemics), resources like jobs, food, water, medical supplies, and housing become scarce. Groups are more likely to see their success as dependent on another group's failure.
Increased Prejudice and Discrimination: This competition leads to increased prejudice, discrimination, and hostility towards the group perceived as competitors. The out-group becomes a scapegoat for the scarcity.
Historical Examples:
The Great Depression: Increased hostility and violence towards immigrant groups (e.g., Mexicans, Filipinos) who were blamed for taking jobs.
Economic Downturns: A rise in hate crimes and xenophobic politics is often correlated with high unemployment and economic anxiety.
Drought and Climate Change: Studies have shown that ethnic tensions can flare in regions experiencing resource scarcity due to climate change, as groups compete for water and arable land.
3. Scapegoating Theory
This is a specific manifestation of the above theories.
Search for a Cause: During a complex crisis (like a plague or economic collapse), people seek a simple, understandable cause. It's easier to blame a visible, minority group than to understand systemic, complex issues.
Historical Examples:
The Black Death (14th Century: Jewish communities across Europe were falsely accused of poisoning wells and were violently persecuted.
HIV/AIDS Crisis (1980s): The disease was wrongly and prejudicially labeled a "gay plague" or linked to Haiti, leading to stigma and violence against these groups.
COVID-19 Pandemic: A significant rise in hate crimes and discrimination against people of Asian descent, who were wrongly blamed for the virus's origin and spread.
4. The Breakdown of Social Order
In extreme crises like state collapse, natural disasters, or civil war, formal institutions (police, courts, government) break down.
Retreat to Primordial Ties: When the state cannot provide security or justice, people retreat to what they perceive as their most fundamental and trustworthy identities: family, clan, tribe, or ethnic group. These networks become the primary source of protection, resources, and trust.
Example: The Yugoslav Wars (1990s): Following the collapse of the communist state, a multi-ethnic society that had lived in relative harmony for decades rapidly fractured along brutal ethnic lines (Serb, Croat, Bosniak), leading to genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Important Nuances and Counterarguments
While the tendency is strong, it is not inevitable. Several factors can mitigate this division:
Strong, Unifying Institutions: Effective leadership and institutions that promote a shared identity and equitable distribution of aid can counteract division. (e.g., "We're all in this together" messaging).
Pre-Existing Levels of Trust: Societies with high levels of social trust and integration between groups are more resilient.
The Nature of the Threat: If the threat is seen as an external enemy (e.g., a foreign attack), it can sometimes unite diverse groups within a nation against a common foe, a phenomenon known as "catastrophic nationalism." (e.g., the initial US response to 9/11).
Cross-Cutting Ties: When people have identities that cross ethnic lines (e.g., being members of the same labor union, religious congregation, or sports club), it can reduce the likelihood of fracturing along a single ethnic dimension.
Conclusion
Yes, there is a strong body of evidence supporting the idea that people tend to separate along ethnic lines in times of trouble. This is driven by deep-seated psychological mechanisms (Social Identity Theory), competition over resources (Realistic Conflict Theory), and the desire to find a simple target to blame (Scapegoating).
However, this is a tendency, not a universal law. The outcome depends heavily on leadership, the strength of pre-existing social structures, and how the crisis itself is framed and managed. History shows us both the tragic consequences of division and the powerful examples of unity in the face of adversity.