What I Hoped to Avoid
We are living in the nightmare that was evident back in the 1980s.
Way back in the 1980s, it became clear to me that diversity was suicide that would make enemies of us all. Power is a zero-sum game, and when you introduce diverse groups, they fight each other and that division destroys society.
The usual nodding idiots told me that I was being hysterical or alarmist. We have laws, you see. People will respond to individual opportunity and want to assimilate and integrate. Everything will turn out just fine.
With the wisdom of time, it is clear that these were merely appeasers and pleasers like most people. They like the committee mentality, which is to avoid controversy and go for symbolic issues in order to pacify and manipulate the herd. Committees are really good at listening to complaints or falling for sales pitches, then writing checks, but universally terrible at maintaining infrastructure, consistency of law/rules, and a focus on the goal. Committees — a product of bureaucracy, itself a product of jobs — are how human civilizations begin their death-process.
Appeasers wanted to stick a band-aid on the diversity problem that had existed since the founding of the nation. We came here as settlers, were attacked by Amerinds, and then conquered them to stop the attacks. No one knew what to do with them, so we kept them around like caged animals in reservations. Some idiots decided slavery was a good idea and imported a lot of Africans, then emancipated them to be low-paid labor, kicking off a century and a half of intermittent race riots. Other idiots wanted cheap labor so they imported Irish, Italian, Jewish, Slavic, and Spanish people to work in the mines, creating ghettos in our cities. By the 1960s, these people wanted to be accepted in WASP society, and they used the African civil rights movement as a way to shoehorn themselves in.
None of this stuff worked, in the sense of producing prosperity, sanity, excellence, health, and clarity. It slowly degraded our society and everyone knew it. But they wanted what they wanted, so they demanded that we make diversity appear to work by applying patches like the Fourteenth Amendment, Civil Rights Acts, disparate impact, Affirmative Action, and political correctness. These were cynical in that people wanted the appearance of diversity working, not actual better conditions for our diversity. That is what came to a head in the LA race riots of 1992. People were asking why, if they were equal and stuff, they still lived in tenement ghettos while the White people were hanging out in Beverly Hills.
It was clear that at some point, society was going to have to deal with this mess. Each generation pushed it on to the next because no one wanted to “look bad” by endorsing something Hitler, the Confederates, or Alexander the Great might have viewed as common sense: that we all want mono-ethnic (not mono-racial) societies. Most people are too addled to parse that, so the simple version is one ethnic group per society. White people never joined the white nationalist movement because they see themselves as ethnic groups from Europe, not generic huwhites with no culture. If your ancestors are from Germany, you are ethnically/genetically German, and this is the one thing you can actually count on in life. Ethnic identity trumps race and certainly citizenship, since at this point “American” means someone who filled out an immigration form online.
Abraham Lincoln wanted to send the slaves to Africa. Andrew Jackson wanted to send the Indians to the third world. The Know-Nothings would have repatriated the Irish Etc to the parts of Europe and the Mediterranean it came from. These people recognized a simple fact: poly-ethnic societies are in the process of suicide, so you need to pick your founding ethnic group and send everyone else home. Then you can start working on your group to exile the criminals, insane, stupid, broken, and incompetent, and your group rises that way. Its gene pool improves as it becomes what it is, iteratively increasing its capacities each generation.
This is how the West evolved after all on our side of the Hajnal Line. We found our best people, made them aristocrats, and had them run everything. The system of “manorial feudalism” meant that people worked for the aristocrats in a role somewhere between duty, employment, and indenture but were guaranteed all the promises of socialism like pensions, medical care, subsidies, and lots of time off. The people who could not hack it got pushed out. In this way, the West improved itself every generation. It did so through mono-ethnicism.
People have been punting on the diversity issue for a long time, just like they have been punting on The Ecocide, big government, the insanity of organized religion, the crisis of everyday mental health that our people suffer, and the rise of enemies like the BRICS who intend to kill us and replace us. Your average person wants to keep doing what he enjoys and ignore everything else. This is the Committee Problem in a mentality, and it explains why human societies degrade over time; people blow off the big important things and focus on symbolic, emotional, and peer pressure success. Diversity is far from being unique among the problems we have ignored, with The Ecocide — the eventual collapse of worldwide natural systems and species — being the worst by far.
Other people like myself warned of this crisis and suggested that we skip all the drama and murder, Holocausts and pogroms, diasporas and Revolutions, and instead simply state that we all want mono-ethnic societies. This was easy for me to see, having grown up in Houston where racial violence was just as often Black versus Asian, or having lived in Los Angeles where I saw one heck of a race war between Hispanics and Blacks, later Asians versus Hispanics. The problem is not Blacks, Asians, or Hispanics; it is diversity itself. Every group wants a mono-ethnic society of its own. People want to live among those like them not just by race but by ethnicity, social class, and religion (although the importance of that is crashing). No one wants to live where their lives are in the hands of people from other races or ethnic groups. Black people often talk about their fear of White cops, but now that most cops in Houston are Hispanic, things are even worse.
So, because optimism dies hard in the heart of the person who enjoys life, I offer up a simple plea to humanity: let us start being realistic and tackling the big issues. We can fix all of this stuff, but not with band-aids. We are going to have to re-organize our societies to avoid The Ecocide, diversity, and other perennial problems. Most things will remain the same, but people will spend more time on homesteads, half of the land will be set aside for nature, and societies will be mono-ethnic. If they are smart, they will also get rid of failed programs like socialism, rent control, the war on drugs, banning abortion, and other attempts to homogenize and standardize people. Nature loves variation where humans like uniform divisions. We are backing away from trying to make everyone behave the same way so that we can keep order and peace. We are moving toward letting people find their own niches and exist without corporate jobs.
In this type of society, most people own their own businesses and live above them on big plots of land where they also have gardens, chickens, livestock, and little ponds if they can. They get their food from the land and spend most of their time at home or in their shops. The purpose of this society is living, not working to pay taxes for the socialist entitlements programs, so people have lower cost of living, higher satisfaction, and most of all more time to spend with friends, culture, family, faith, hobbies, and meditation of their experience of life. This is a saner world. We can achieve it, but it requires giving up illusions like diversity.
Right now in the UK, pre-teen girls are arming themselves to keep their siblings and friends from becoming victims of foreign grooming gangs. English — not British! not UK! not “White”! — flags are going up everywhere. People realize that diversity has failed and now we need to get rid of it, which means going back to mono-ethnic societies, so that in England for example you have only genetically/ethnically English people, and no hybrids. You focus on your gene pool and improving it by rewarding the good people among your tribe, but you have to “dwell alone” as a tribe in order to do that. The UK government is stalling on going mono-ethnic, and this has created civil war conditions. That was one of the things I hoped to avoid.
The other of course is race warfare. When you have more than one ethnic group in a place, only one ethnic group can be in power… so they oppress each other. At first they work together against the founding heritage group, but over time, it becomes clear that each group is fighting for its own interests by beating down, stealing from, demoralizing, raping, and killing each other. Do you want another Trail of Tears, Holocaust, Kosovo, Troubles, or Tulsa race massacre? You only avoid those by ending diversity. We can still avoid this grim future if we are honest now about what we actually want, which is mono-ethnic societies without the ills of modernity like corporate jobs, high taxes, graffiti, pollution, religious fanaticism, gambling, and ecocide. All of those are the results of the same system that promotes diversity.
Back in the 1980s, we hoped to avoid the mess we are in now. No one wanted to listen and they in fact actively excluded us. But now we have a chance again to avoid a future tragedy. Maybe this time we should listen to common sense and actually address the problem instead of going into hamsterlike denial again. We are on the cusp of a WW2-level redesign of civilization that gets us past the horrors of modernity, if we have the will to make those choices. If we keep punting on these obvious perpetual problems, eventually the dam will break and the raw violence of humanity will be unleashed on all of us.